Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
×

Did you know you can cook bread with steam?

Yatırımsız Deneme Bonusu

Yatırımsız deneme bonusunun ne olduğunu, nasıl alındığını ve faydalanma yöntemlerini öğrenin. Risk almadan bonus avantajlarından yararlanın!Online bahis ve casino dünyası giderek genişlerken, kullanıcılarına sunduğu avantajlar da artmaya devam ediyor. Yatırım yapmadan kazanç elde etme şansı sunan yatırımsız deneme bonusu, bu avantajlar arasında en cazip olanlardan biri olarak öne çıkıyor. "Yatırımsız Deneme Bonusu" adını verdiğimiz bu…

Read more

Whales: Giants of the Ocean

Whales: Giants of the Ocean Whales are among the largest and most remarkable animals on Earth. These marine mammals live in oceans around the world, from warm tropical waters to the cold seas surrounding the poles. Life Beneath the Surface Although whales spend their lives in water, they breathe…

Read more

1x Bet Download Account Verification Guide

Why Download the 1x Bet App? How to Download the 1x Bet APK Safely Registration Process – From Install to First Bet Bonuses and Promotions for New Users Payment Methods, Deposits, and Withdrawals Mobile Experience vs Desktop – What to Expect Security, Verification, and Responsible Gambling Customer Support and Licensing Details Frequently Asked Questions about…

Read more

© 2026 Appliancenews. All Rights Reserved.

Another Bad News Day For Apple As Core iPhone Patent Ruled Invalid, Samsung Estatic

Samsung has just got a big break that could well save them having to pay Apple over $600 Million after it was ruled that a core Apple patent was invalid.

It now appears that Apple’s iPhone patents-the one that a jury used to decide that Samsung owed Apple hundreds of millions of dollars in damages-was just ruled invalid by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office claims US Macworld. 

The patent in question, D618677, covers the design of the iPhone 3G and was filed in November 2008, but Apple relied on two patents filed in January 2007 to give that 2008 patent an earlier protection date. It’s a common practice, but the earlier patents have to sufficiently describe the later one in order to extend the protection date. The U.S. patent office decided that those two original patents didn’t describe the design patented in late 2008 sufficiently enough, and that perhaps that patent should have never been issued to begin with, according to FOSS Patents.

In the nearly two years between the two patent filing dates, a host of other smartphone makers produced phones that looked similar to the iPhone, including Samsung. Those devices stand as “prior art” now, which means that the patent covers design traits that were already common by the time it was filed.

Currently  Samsung is still fighting the $548 million damages bill it owes Apple, money that was awarded largely due to this now invalid design patent. 

A date for a new trial, the third in this lengthy legal battle, has yet to be set to determine the final amount Samsung owes, but it’s likely that Samsung will point to the patent office’s ruling as evidence that it owes Apple nothing.

Leave a comment

0.0/5